Positive economics is sometimes defined as the economics of "what is", whereas normative economics discusses "what ought to be". The distinction was exposited by John Neville Keynes (1891) and elaborated by Milton Friedman in an influential 1953 essay. Still, positive economics is commonly deemed necessary for the ranking of economic policies or outcomes as to acceptability (Wong, 1987, p. 921), which is normative economics.
Environmental economics is needed to include ecological resources into the economic analysis, in order to correct markets failures, and pursue optimal allocation of resources. By the way, conditions for perfeGenerally, a perfectly competitive market exists when every participant is a "price taker," and no participant influences the price of the product it buys or sells. Specific characteristics may include:• Infinite Buyers/Infinite Sellers • Zero Entry/Exit Barriers • Perfect Information • Transactions are Costless • Firms Aim to Maximize Profits • Homogeneous Products
The market does not lead to efficient solutions because of various types of market failures:- Negative externalities- Public goods- Imperfect information- Participatory and Empowerment Failures- Missing markets: open access to resources
No comments:
Post a Comment